Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Rice & Wheat Merchants, Gohawaii

What is an entrepreneur by liajorgge

Friday, May 6, 2011

Difference Between General Warranty And Warranty

Seller liajorgge Professional video

Thursday, May 5, 2011

Cytherea Bangin' Whitey

List of award-winning students to occupy leading positions in each Academic School

RELATIONSHIP OF STUDENTS THAT ARE MADE BY THE FIRST ORDER OF MERIT OF EACH SCHOOL IN THE YEAR 2010
UNT
1) School of Biological Sciences

1. ACADEMIC SCHOOL PROF. MICROBIOLOGY AND PARASITOLOGY
1 º. Since 1555 ANGULO LUIS ADAN WALLS (Cycle III)
2 º. Since MILENA AVALOS Sheyla HORNA 15.53 (Cycle III)

2. ACADEMIC SCHOOL PROF. BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
1 º. Since NOVOA JUANA PEÑA BLANCA 15.78049 (Promotion 2010)
2 º. Since PICHARDO OLIVER 15.36585 RIGHT HAND (Promotion 2010)

3. ACADEMIC SCHOOL PROF. OF FISHERY
1 º. Since JESUS \u200b\u200bFLORES LORENZO LEON 14.68 (Promotion 2008)
2 º. Since 1447 CASTANEDA DAVID OSCAR TEJADA (Promotion 2009)


2) FACULTY OF LAW AND POLITICAL SCIENCE
1st. Since CIRILO PORTILLO JONATHAN CANDLE 16.19 (sixth year)
2nd. Since BLOCK MORENO MAURICIO RICARDO AUGUSTO 15.70 (sixth year)

3) SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS
1. SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS
1 º. Since COLLANTES GOICOCHEA ESTHER ERIKA 15.68 (Cycle III)
2 º. Since SANTOS VASQUEZ Jhon 14.86 (Cycle III)
2. SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT
1 º. Since Rosybel CRISTINA RAMIREZ ALVA 16.75 (Cycle III)
2 º. Since Yohana ATOCHA VANESSA BELTRAN 1626 (Cycle III)

3. SCHOOL OF ACCOUNTING
1 º. Since CHAVEZ INGRID MARION MEDINA 06/16 (Cycle III)
2 º. Since GUZMAN VASQUEZ ERIKA ELIZABETH 15.81 (Cycle III)


4) Faculty of Agricultural Sciences

1. SCHOOL ACAD. PROF. AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
1 º. Since ROSARIO DOMINGUEZ JOE MAX 14.69 (Promotion 2006)
2 º. LUIS SALINAS NOE BLAS Since 1441 (Promotion 2009)

2. SCHOOL ACAD. PROF. AGRO-INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
1 º Place ROJAS TORRES SHIRLEY Steffany 8.16 (Promotion 2010) 2nd Place
BAZAN MANUEL EDUARDO CRUZ 15.37 (Promotion 2010)

3. ACADEMIC SCHOOL PROF. OF AGRONOMY
1 º Place Lizet VELARDE MARIA Pretzel 15.28 (Promotion 2008) 2nd Place
PASTOR SANDY WALLS 14.97 (Promotion 2010)

4. ACADEMIC SCHOOL PROF. ANIMAL
1 º. Since RONCAL DÁVALOS HIRVIN ANTHONY 17 058 (Promotion 2007)
2 º. Since FLOR MARÍA GUERRERO 14 959 RIVERS (Promotion 2008)



5) SCHOOL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
1. ACADEMIC SCHOOL PROF. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
1 º. EDSON Since ARANDA MANUEL SALAZAR 16 (Promotion 2010)
2 º. Since IBAÑEZ LOREN MARIBEL HUIZAR 15.95 (Promoción 2010)

2. ESCUELA ACADÉMICO PROF. DE INGENIERÍA QUÍMICA
1º. Puesto JHON LUIS VALDERRAMA LARA 14.8 (Promoción 2010)
2º Puesto SARA ANDREA LÓPEZ BACILIO 13.6 (Promoción 2010)


6) FACULTAD DE INGENIERÍA
1. ESCUELA ACADÉMICO PROFESIONAL DE INGENIERÍA INDUSTRIAL
1º. Puesto BILLY JEAN POOL LLAMOGA CRUZ 16.72 (III Ciclo)
2º. Puesto ALBERTO JOSÉ LEVI DÍAZ CHUNGA 16.44 (III Ciclo)

2. ESCUELA ACADÉMICO PROFESIONAL DE INGENIERIA DE MINAS
1º. Puesto HENRRY LENNIN MUÑOZ CHÁVARRY 14.113 (IX Ciclo)
1º Puesto RULLIT URBINA SALAS 14 113 (Cycle IX)

3. PROFESSIONAL ACADEMIC SCHOOL MECHATRONICS
1 º. Since ALVA HENRY ALCANTARA Josmell 16.77 (Cycle III)
2 º. Since IBAÑEZ SECOND ANTHONY AVALOS 15.22 (Cycle IX)

4. ACADEMIC SCHOOL PROF. SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 1st Place
Geancarlo QUINCHO 16.10417 JOEL SOLANO (Cycle III) 2nd Place
ROLANDO JAVIER BELTRAN Berrú 16.00556 (Cycle IX)

5. ACADEMIC SCHOOL PROF. METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING
1 º. Since MONTES RAFAEL VASQUEZ GERMÁN 16.14286 (Promotion 2009)
2 º. Since JESUS \u200b\u200bRODRIGUEZ ALDO HORNA 15.43182 (Promotion 2010)

6. ACADEMIC SCHOOL PROF. MATERIALS ENGINEERING
1 º. Since MERCEDES PALOMINO CORALIE BECERRA 14.9520 (V cycle)
2 º. Since 14.5907 EDGAR CESAR MEDINA CROSS (X Series)

7. ACADEMIC SCHOOL PROF. MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
1 º Place EINSTEIN AYALA NELSON DIONISIO 16.66 (Cycle III) 2nd Place GILMER
VASQUEZ FIDEL ARRIVASPLATA 15.62 (Promotion 2008)

7) SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE
1. ACADEMIC SCHOOL PROF. ANTHROPOLOGY
1 º. Since ALAY VICTORIA GONZALES HILARIA 16.52 (Cycle II)
2 º. EDGAR MONTOYA Cachay Since 1640 (Cycle VIII)
2. SCHOOL ACADEMIC PROF. TOURISM
1 º. Since NEYSSER HORNA JUAN RODRIGUEZ 1632 (Cycle VIII)
2 º. Since ANDLY QUIROZ HERNANDEZ ZOILA 16.16 (Cycle VI)

3. SCHOOL ACAD. PROF. SOCIAL WORK
1 º. Since KATERINA Vereau REYES Reymi 15.63 (Cycle IV)
2 º. Since Enith LEFT LESLY OYARCE 15.56 (Cycle II)

4. ACADEMIC SCHOOL PROF. ARCHAEOLOGY
1 º. Since JOSÉ MARÍA VENEGAS CULQUICHICÓN 15.48864 (Cycle VIII)
2 º. Since MUNOZ ESTELA JULY MinAna 15.48485 (Cycle VI)

5. ACADEMIC SCHOOL PROF. HISTORY
1 º. Since HERNÁN CORDOVA ARNOLD BELLY 16.02 (Cycle VI)
ARTHUR 2 º Place EDUARDO QUEZADA Zumarán 16.00 (Cycle IV)

8) FACULTY OF EDUCATION
1. ACADEMIC SCHOOL PROF. INITIAL EDUCATION
1 º. Since HUAMÁN DÍAZ YELPSIN 16.57 (5th Year)
2 º. Since Milagritos XIMENA DEL CARMEN SANCHEZ LEON 16.49 (4th Year)

2. ACADEMIC SCHOOL PROF. PRIMARY EDUCATION
1 º. GONZALES JOEL ANTHONY PACHECO Since 1622 (Fourth Year)
2 º. Since Lizbet JENNY MEDINA QUIROZ 16.19 (V Year)

3. ACADEMIC SCHOOL OF EDUCATION SCHOOL BUSINESS
1 º. Since SHEA AURORA REYES LEIVA 16.95 (Fourth Year)
2 º. WILLIAMS ORLANDO TAPIA CHAVEZ since 1638 (I year)

4. ACADEMIC SCHOOL PROF. COMMUNICATION SCIENCES

1 º. Since ALICIA VASQUEZ DORIS CUBA 15.97 (Cycle III)
2 º. Since ZENAIDA RAQUEL WALL WELL 15.93 (Cycle III)

9) SCHOOL OF PHYSICAL SCIENCE AND MATH
1. SCHOOL OF STATISTICS
1 º. Since Ipanaqué ALEXANDER JIMENEZ 14.2657 (Prom.2010)
2 º. JOSE LUIS TORRES Cáceda Since 14.2270 (Prom.2010)
2. SCHOOL OF PHYSICAL
1 º. Since SALDANA JUAN CARLOS ESTRADA 16.02 (X Series)
2 º. Since GUARD JENNIFER DIANA ALDAMA 15.84 (Cycle IV)

3. SCHOOL OF COMPUTER
1 º Place PEREDA ORTÍZ RODOLFO 15.61 (X Series) 2nd Place
WALTER FRANCISCO LINARES Kcomt 15.83 (Cycle VII)

4. PROFESSIONAL ACADEMIC SCHOOL MATHEMATICS
1 º. Since Josie JOAO RAMIREZ AGUIRRE 15.21 (IX Cycle)
2 .- As CARLOS HUMBERTO DE LA CRUZ CHAVEZ 15 033 (VII Cycle)

10) SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
1 º Place CASEY JOEL BENITES MOYA 16,267 (1st Year)
2 º Place KAREN VALVERDE VIVIANA PINILLOS 15,706 (4to.Año)
 SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY
1 º. LUIS CARLOS VELEZ Since TABOADA 5th.
Year 2 º. Since SERGIO VARGAS TWO ARMS 5th.
year
11) SCHOOL OF NURSING
1 º. THALIA Since YAJHAIRA RUIZ 16541 VALVERDE (Cycle VIII)
2 º. Since ROMAN CHAVEZ MARIA VICTORIA 16 158 (Cycle VIII)

12) SCHOOL OF PHARMACY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
1 º. Since HUARI AMANDA MARIN GLORIA 15 186 (Series II)
2 º. Since JAMELIA GASPAR Trebejo 14,860 KELLY (Cycle II)

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

Squash Court, Clapham

Sales fundamental principle: Listen to your customers and understand your market

The numbers are important and can say a lot about our customers. However, there is valuable information which can only receive if you hear what they think about you.
Since the beginning of the year, my bank launched a telemarketing campaign to try to position more credit cards to their customers. Surely this project is very important to them, as I have called 8 times en estos 3 meses. Lo peor es que recibo estas llamadas en los momentos más inoportunos: un viernes a las 8 de la noche, un domingo a las 10 de la mañana o durante un viaje a Sudamérica, con su respectivo costo de roaming.

El jefe de telemarketing o, como diría Joseph Jaffe, el Chief Interruptor Officer, logrará tener un efecto concreto la siguiente vez que me llamen, aunque aún no he decidido cual será. Sigo dudoso entre aceptar la tarjeta o pasar a la sucursal a cancelar mi cuenta.

Más allá del incierto éxito del marketing por interrupción, del que tanto habla Seth Godin, me pregunto si mi banco será capaz de recoger y analizar experiencias como la mía. O quizás sólo analizarán el éxito de la campaña en términos numéricos, es decir, reportando cuántas nuevas tarjetas lograron colocar.

Ahora, traslademos este caso al mundo en línea.

Hace unos días volví a escuchar una queja entre quienes están en el medio del comercio electrónico en México. Esta vez, de parte del director comercial de una importante marca que, además de vender a través de medio off-line, cuenta con un canal de ventas en línea. La queja fue: "Mi canal de eCommerce no sirve porque en México la gente no se anima a comprar en-línea".

Mi primera pregunta al respecto fue: "¿Cómo estás tan seguro that? "To which he replied:" After an analysis of the metrics for my site, I realize that there are many people making the reservation of my services on the site but does not complete the purchase, prefer to do the transaction directly in my branches. "

My next question was:" How are you so sure that prefer to do the transaction in your branches and not on your site? "His response was:" The numbers say it. "
is a problem analysis.

Both cases are examples of a common problem in the analysis: the extreme focus on numbers. The numbers are able to describe what happens on our site give us valuable information in a quantitative way. But this is only part of the story, the second essential part of web analytics is focusing on qualitative information. The type of information that can tell us why things happen.

The example of electronic commerce, commercial director's statement is a true part and the other uncertain. While it is entirely correct to assert that "people are not completing the transaction online, there is not enough information to declare that the reason is" people in Mexico are not encouraged to buy online. " This is only a hypothesis about the behavior of their visitors.

Would not it be interesting to know how many people really wanted to complete a transaction online but just did not make it? Experiment



Some time ago I did an experiment to try to measure the maturity of the online E-Commerce in Mexico. Wanted to buy a LCD screen and decided to shop online. To keep things simple, I started the experiment after taking the decision on which brand and model to buy.

The executive summary of my experiment might look like this:
Time taken: 2:30 pm
Sites visited: 6
Summary of problems encountered:
internal search: Using the form of one of the sites, the results I deliver products that are related to appliances, electronics and photography, but no screen or television. After 10 attempts, I gave up.

Navigation: Another place has no form. I try to navigate the entertainment category, but search through hundreds of products in this category demands too much time. After 15 minutes, I gave up. Cart

: I found the product you are looking for somewhere else, but when added to cart took me a different product. In the sixth attempt I managed to add just the product wanted, but at this point distrust made me give up.

Catalog: On another site it took only 15 seconds to realize that they had to catalog the product you are looking for. This was the best user experience throughout the experiment. Thank you for respecting my time! Result


After many failed attempts I closed my computer, I got in the car and went to the nearest store. Two hours later I was at home with the screen.

the end of the experiment I noticed 2 problems:

Logistics: Experience instant satisfaction I felt, having the home screen only 2 hours, there would have been the same for my purchase online. I never read the point of delivery terms, but I fear it probably would have had to endure several days of waiting and a wide delivery schedule (8 am to 9 pm for example).

Accessibility: After a couple of days, someone made me realize that I forgot to include an important place in the test. It is unfortunate that this site has never appeared in the results of search engines. Conclusion



is very likely that I am not an exceptional case and that this experience is repeated a few thousand times per month on all those sites. But the major revelation of this experiment is as follows:
Reports from all the sites visited appeared as "a visitor who did not buy." And a person reviewing this information could be inferred incorrectly that I was "a visitor who did not dare to buy." Solution


If you want your visitors to find out why they act the way they do, the only way to know is to ask them. There are many tools on the market that make it possible to obtain qualitative and help you discover the why of things. These tools focus on measuring customer satisfaction (or commonly known as Voice of Customer). Are usually surveys that you can apply a certain percentage of your visitors and satisfaction information obtained at the page level or at the comprehensive visit your site.

some time ago, the director of one of the biggest brands in business (online and offline) told me: "I do not know if my strategy to focus on driving online sales, or should I make my site the best catalog products online and then drive traffic to my branches. " To which I replied: "It's a great question! But do not me me, ask that visitors to your site. Find out what they expect from you." The solution may be as simple as sending a mail survey to your database